Actions

Talk

Palestine Peace Not Apartheid

From WikiSummaries, free book summaries

It seems like the opening section should be revised -- this isn't itself a book review ("I like this book because") but an impartial summary, right?

Also, if we'd like to make this entry a useful scholarly resource, I think we should add some scholarly journal reviews of the book that speak to its strengths and flaws, such as: http://www.meforum.org/article/1633 199.244.214.30 11:36, 12 February 2007 (EST)

I agree! Thank you for bringing the quality of the article into discussion! I will do what I can to maintain a certain level of quality and I encourage all readers to contribute and correct as they see fit. Admin 16:26, 12 February 2007 (EST)

Under Chapter 1; "This region is important because of it volatility and ties to terrorist groups." should read "This region is important because of it(s) volatility and ties to terrorist groups." Under Chapter 13; Should "Carter met with Beilin, who told him their goal was to issue a peace proposal without either government that would be acceptable to both sides." read as "Carter met with Beilin, who told him their goal was to issue a peace proposal with() either government that would be acceptable to both sides."? In addition to this, I disagree with User:199.244.214.30|199.244.214.30. That reference is NOT a scholarly journal review that speaks the strength and flaws of the book. It is in fact a biased commentary critical of the book. If I am not mistaken, Mr. Stein and his group of advisers are pro-Israeli advocates. However, Mr. Stein's commentary may be included under a sub-title for articles critical of the book. Equally, there should also be a sub-title for commentaries supporting the book.--60.50.26.117 08:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)